Thursday, May 31, 2007
Startup Offers Low Budget Ad Options-In Low Traffic Areas
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
NBC Hires Outsider For Entertainment Position
Click here to read the article.
Monday, May 28, 2007
Got An Idea On How To Improve This Blog?
Carl's Jr. Angry With Jack-In-The-Box Advertising
Click here to see one of the spots.
I happen to find the spots extremely successful for brand recall and they are extremely funny as well. I've always been impressed with any of the Jack in the Box spots and this campaign is not only funny, but also timely as well. Several other restaurants are advertising their 100% Angus Beef burgers and Jack has capitalized on a timely and relevant name.
It also doesn't hurt the fact that Carl's Jr. is making a wave about the spots; all press is good press.
NBC Looking To Remove Program Chief
Sunday, May 27, 2007
Axe Reaches A New Low And Creates The Worst Commercial Series Ever
Saturday, May 26, 2007
User Created Ads Cost More Than You Think
Television Stations Look For Content Alternatives To Syndication
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Web Spending Rises To $16.9 Billion in 2006
The biggest surprise out of this article is that online advertisements only made up 5.9% of last years total ad spending. This reinforces that perception is reality. If you sampled a group of people then you would probably find that many believe that online ad spending makes up closer to 15-20%. Although many believe that online ad spending is growing at a rapid rate, 35% last year to be exact, it still has a lot of ground to gain on television.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
American Idol Sells $1.3 Million Spots For Finale
The Super Bowl fetched an average of $2.4 million per spot in 2007, which means a reality show is creeping closer to becoming the nations biggest advertising event.
I fully believe this is still a bargain, even at the rate of $1.3 million. In fact, next year I would budget for three spots. There are not a whole lot of programs on tv that reach a wide demographic like this one, or have the viewers American Idol does.
Although Ford and Coca-Cola have spent a small fortune the past few years on product placement packages with AI, they are the first two advertisers that come to mind when I reference the show. Each time you see Simon, Paula, and Randy, you always see a Coca-Cola glass, with the words positioned perfectly so you can read them. Ford uses the time to show off new vehicles and plaster their name all over the program.
Would you advertise in American Idol? Post your comments here or email me and I'll post your feedback.
The CW Network Creating More Buzz With Advertising
Monday, May 21, 2007
Marketers Struggle To Keep Consumers Entertained During Ad Breaks
Many networks are looking at the ideas of non-commercial programs that feature only in-content advertising and product placement. The CW Network announced last week during "Upfront" that they will be running a show without any commercial breaks. The program is titled "CW Now" and will air at 7pm. The show already has six advertisers who will sponsor segments and receive product placement segments as well.
The CW Network, which targets young adults, will be one of the first to test such a program. The program will also feature "Cwickies" which are five second or less advertisements. All in an attempt to keep you seated.
But will this new advertising concept really work or will you still flip the channel? I believe advertisers need to stop putting so much emphasis on the advertisements, and more emphasis on the content and programming. Top rated programs such as American Idol, 24, and Heroes probably tend to have a higher commerical viewer rating than others because the dedicated viewers don't want to miss a second of the program. This of course adds to the fact that these mentioned programs are already some of the most expensive on the market to advertise in.
I applaud the CW Network for taking the first step towards fresh content and keeping viewers entertained for 30 straight minutes. The x-factor out of all this is the content. Will "CW Now" be an entertaining enough program to keep viewers watching. If not, don't expect any blue chip advertisers to be signing up for these sponsorships again anytime soon. Post your comments below.
San Francisco Chronicle Cutting Staff By 25%
Fantasy and Sci-Fi To Dominate New Fall Lineups
Many networks are turning to non-reality programming this season as the fall lineup features more sci-fi and fantasy shows than ever before. It can be seen as a desperate attempt to garner ratings or it's everyone riding off the success NBC had with Heroes this past year. NBC which will feature a few more programs that fall into the "fantasy" category obviously saw the connection they made with viewers and are going to ride that opportunity. It now appears that CW and FOX will be looking to steal those viewers for their sci-fi programs as well.
I feel we reached a point of too many cop dramas the past two years and those have killed themselves off. I have a feeling that the sci-fi programs won't make it as long as the cop dramas but I've been wrong in the past. Post your comments below or send me feedback by clicking here.
Advertising Age Presents Upfront Week Videos
Friday, May 18, 2007
Advertisers Boycotting XM Radio Show
Microsoft Acquires Advertising Company aQuantive for $6 Billion
Thursday, May 17, 2007
The CW Network Explores The Idea of Five-Second Ads
McDonalds New Television Campaign Focuses On Employee Pride
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
AOL Takes Their First Step Towards Mobile Advertising
The purchase gives AOL a direct line to mobile carriers and others in the mobile advertising industry. Mobile advertising is projected to become a hot issue for advertisers as soon as tomorrow, but the problem still lies in the ability to reach the masses. As quoted in this article, Third Screen Media still only delivers about 225 mobile impressions each month, not considered a large number in the mobile industry.
I applaud AOL for taking this step into the mobile industry. While I believe we are still years away from this being accepted by blue-chip advertisers, I think we are even further away from it being accepted by consumers. The cell phone is still a place that we are not getting hit with messages and many believe consumers want to keep it that way. Call to action advertisements are going to be tough as well, because I don't see people walking into grocery stores to redeem their 2-for-1 Coke ads by showing their cell phone to the clerk. I also don't see us spending the time to download the coupon and print it off.
We are in a time right now where consumers don't even want to give out their email because they don't like spam. Spam is nothing more than an email that pops up in your inbox; that you don't even have to click on, just simply delete. Will you continue to fill out your phone number on the registration card if you begin to receive SMS messages every hour? This is the question we will wait on and in the mean time we'll watch several companies spend millions of dollars.
The Most Brilliant Banner Ads Ever
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
NBC Presents New Fall Lineup To Advertisers
It appears advertisers were wowed by the new programs however no big revelations thus far. NBC might get lucky and have a major breakthrough like Heroes again this year, which would really help them get out of third place.
Monday, May 14, 2007
Media Buys Continue To Overlook Spanish Speaking Viewers
NBC Announces New Fall Lineup
Networks Broadcasting Your Favorite Shows Online
For years the networks have struggled to increase web traffic to their sites. What would propel you to go to NBC.com, or ABC.com? Maybe to read the bio about your favorite soap star? Possibly to check out the new fall schedule? Whatever the reason is today, the networks have given us little reason in the past. However the media landscape that is always changing is now giving the networks good reason to visit their site.
In my opinion, this is going to be one of the many components to online advertising that will stand the length of time. While my feeling on banner ads is not as hot as pre-roll video and viral marketing sites, network content is the key to advertisers reaching their target market. With the growth of DVRs, it makes perfect sense for content to shift online. iTunes has already exhibited this model without the advertisers, but with advertisers the cost is paid for and the user gets the chance to enjoy content they might have missed on television.
While the viewers are shifting online though the chance is that over time more eyes will shift away from television. If I know I can catch my favorite program a few days later online, then why would I continue to pay the high cost of a TiVo subscription? Agencies though are going to have to have low expecations while this shift happens. And while I don't see it happening for another 5-7 years, it still is another change in the media landscape that is potential.
Sunday, May 13, 2007
Geico Re-Writing The Rules Of Branding
When you see creative from the brands mentioned above, you know you will see someting you've seen in the past. For example, McDonalds will show you the golden arches and maybe Ronald with a happy family. With Verizon, it's the network and their glasses wearing spokesman. Apple these days has the competition between the PC and Mac, or the iPod with colorful backgrounds and shadow dancing people. Which is different from the original days of Apple. And with Jack-in-the-Box, you're guaranteed to see Jack.
The point is that each of these brands have built up over time an image of one main character. They stick with that character and then go back to them from time to time, never straying from the main spokesman or spokeswoman. Even if that brand doesn't show the character in the commercial, they still refer to them somehow and you recall them once the spot is finished.
Geico has completely re-written these rules. If this were a psych test and I told you to give me one word when I showed you the word Geico, odds are you would say either "Gecko" or "Caveman." If I then asked you to recall your favorite commercial then you would have several options to work from, several of which have a different main character but all with the same message.
Over the last three years when Geico first started off as the insurance company with the little talking Gecko, their brand message remained the same. If you saw a billboard with a Gecko on it, then you thought Geico. Now that billboard could have several different messages and you might think the same message.
It appears though the Caveman might be taking over the Gecko's image. Which could cause problems for the insurance company. Geico has spent more money over the past year marketing the caveman, which I believe was an accident in the beginning. The first caveman commercial can be seen here. It featured the caveman as a part of the production crew being offended when the spokesman said, "so easy, a caveman could do it." Then slowly we started seeing more commercials that featured this same message. The reason I call it a potential accident is because I don't think they had any idea that the public would respond in such as positive way to a caveman.
The next Geico commercials were simple follow ups that featured the spokesman trying to make peace with the cavemen. Then this year we have seen more cavemen commercials than Gecko ones. In fact, it almost appears they are trying to quickly scramble Gecko ones to make up for the fact that the caveman has gained so much popularity. Earlier this week I introduced the Caveman's web site. Check it out here and try not to spend 25 minutes there like I did.
We're also seeing the Caveman walking through the airport, working with a therapist, and appearing on a national news program to debate the idea of a caveman.
The Gecko and Caveman though are only two examples of images or faces of Geico we've seen in the past. Late in 2006, Geico introduced a series of spots that featured celebrities, mostly B-list celebrities, interpreting real life Geico insurance stories. They featured Verne Troyer, Little Richard, Burt Bacharach, Don Lafontaine, and Charo.
We've also seen scattered commercials featuring the "Good News" campaign. Check out Tony Little and Dr. Parker.
No other brand goes out of its way to produce such a wide variety of spots. No other brand takes this much risk by using such a wide variety of commercials. No other brand can bring it all back to one cohesive message that we will recall. When we say Geico, you might think of a few different characters or spokesmen, but they have trained you to think, "saving 15% or more or more on car insurance by switching to Geico." This is the new rules of branding. Bringing it all back to one message that sells a product or brand. Geico has become successful not only in entertaining us, but also in building their brand.
Saturday, May 12, 2007
Networks Face The Tough Decision To Renew Programs On The Bubble
It appears all networks, including NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, and CW will have to make the decision to renew or cancel several programs. Earlier this week we learned NBC will be ordering several dramas for the 2007-2008 television season. Will other networks head that way?
It appears CBS might be heading towards a comedy block which would play off Julia Louis-Dreyfus hit, "The New Adventures of Old Christine." NBC might decide to drop Scrubs, only to potentially lose it to ABC, who produces the show (ABCTV). ABC though might have the hardest decisions with long running programs "According to Jim" and "George Lopez." According to the article the two shows have enough episodes to run in syndication so it's possible a shift could be made to another channel, like TBS or CW.
Stay tuned for the next few weeks to find out what the networks decide upon.
Consumers Marketing To Themselves
I couldn't agree more with the online marketing emphasis of this article. The user generated content gives consumers an opportunity to feel like they are a part of their favorite brand. The microsites that these brands have created are much stronger than any banner advertising campaign you will see on a news site.
Check out some of these sites here at Cadillac, Geico, and Burger King.
How much time do you spend on these sites?
Advertising Age Presents A Marketers Round Table
Friday, May 11, 2007
NBC Orders Drama Programs For Next Season
Thursday, May 10, 2007
General Motors Wants To Start Buying Newspaper Advertorials
Today Advertising Age is reporting that General Motors, who has already significantly cut back on their newspaper adverising, is interested in buying newspaper advertorials. I can't decide if this is one more sign that the end is near for newspapers or if this is just a really stupid decision by General Motors.
I'm going to cut straight to the point. If full-page advertisements and ten-page pullouts don't get me to act upon a new car special, then tell me why I would decide to take ten minutes or more out of my day to read an advertorial that was paid for?
Advertorials are a paid advertisement in the form of an article. It is a mix of an advertisement and an editorial. They have been successful for companies facing PR scandals and problems as well as companies who are just trying to change their image while voicing their opinion to their consumers. Many large corporations used them in the past; before the power of the internet. As you could imagine, companies adapted to the web and found ways to reach their consumers, not via a dead medium.
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
Google Ripped At Media Event
Advertising 101 by BNET.com
Is Targeted Advertising As Efficient As Broad Advertising?
Gourmet Marketing Working Well For Various Restaurants
Monday, May 7, 2007
Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal
NBC Says No To Thirty-Second Online Adverisements
Sunday, May 6, 2007
Mobile Phone Advertising Still Lacking
My opinion on the matter is that mobile phone advertising will take another 4-6 years before we see any significant success. As the article describes, targeting of relevant ads for consumers is very hard. Just because someone is a Sprint carrier doesn't mean they are interested in a free bottle of shampoo or 25% off a major department store.
With television, advertisers can target niche programs on cable and broadcast networks. This gives the advertiser a chance to make an emotional connection with a specific message. Mobile phone ads are to the masses and miss the spot many times due to lack of relevancy. We know nothing about the person holding the phone other than their home location because of their area code. Even that is to be missed because the term "mobile" means they can leave their area.
I don't disagree though with these advertisers and carriers trying the idea. The first to continue to try it and perfect it will be very happy once consumers catch on. But until then, money will continue to be lost and consumers will continue to be disenchanted by the sight of a video or ad popping up on their phone.
MSN Should Capitalize on Out-of-Home Media Opportunities
Sure anyone can find content. You can download the latest top rated videos on YouTube and lace some advertisements in the middle and consider that content. You can simply subscribe to the Associated Press and play an ad between each news clip. You can even hire a graphics department to develop attractive and sleek pictures to catch peoples attention. This however, is not content.
Good content comes from knowing your audience and finding something relevant for them. Remember that in-home television, viewers choose the channel they want to watch. In the OOH model, the audience can not choose so it has to be relevant to them, in order to get them to watch. Good content is also a mix of relevant info about the viewers settings.
If the OOH network setting is a subway system in a busy metropolitan city then the content needs to mirror what those people specifically want. Not only does this increase the chance of your audience paying attention to your content, it also proves a better case to the advertisers. One example would be riders of the BART system in San Francisco. Proper content for these riders would not only include the typical info of weather and daily news, but also information about the traffic conditions surrounding the stations, airport delays for riders heading to Oakland and San Francisco airports, or interactive maps of tourist destinations, and especially up to the date information about Silicon Valley technology magnates.
The point is this content is hard to come by. The reason is because content is expensive to continually develop, find, and especially create. Content teams are an unnecessary cost to OOH media companies until they sell enough advertising to justify. (You see the chicken and egg thing here, right?)
So back to the original header for this blog. There are only a few companies who have the resources to become large OOH Media players. Right now several companies are dabbling in the opportunity, few have mastered the industry. Microsoft could be that company. There are two reasons.
MSN features more content than any site across the net. They feature information that targets both men, women, teens, and seniors. Their content ranges from autos to entertainment and health to sports. They feature breaking news, videos, pictures, and detailed city information. More importantly, they aggregate content from all sites online.
MSN is also one of the leaders in online advertising sales. To go along with their wide range of content, they have a wide range of advertisements to target each demographic. MSN does this extremely well.
I don't even have to begin to discuss the resources and technology barriers that most companies face. MSN would have no problem with the initial investments and upkeep.
As you can tell by now I'm a big proponent of OOH media and the industry is still seeking a dominant leader to come in and take over several vertical markets; retail, rail, airports, college campuses, restaurants, etc. MSN solves the problems that most OOH media companies face. Content and advertising.
The next time you see an OOH network, think of the possibilities for MSN.
TiVo Begins Advertising Campaign To Boost Subscribers
Shock Jock Talk Radio Remains Unchanged Despite Imus Fallout
Saturday, May 5, 2007
MTV Takes In-Content Advertising To A Whole New Level
MSN Remains Microsoft Weakest Business Component
Do You Have A BullS*** Job?
When this list first came out, Advertising Agency Account Executive was number one.
Friday, May 4, 2007
Microsoft In Talks To Buy Yahoo
More thoughts later.
Thursday, May 3, 2007
Imus To Sue CBS Radio?
Wednesday, May 2, 2007
Digital Signage Expo May 16-17th
Tuesday, May 1, 2007
Are DVRs Really Hurting Advertisers?
The truth is though I believe we are all over reacting. I have no data or factual info to back me up on this but it is my personal opinion that we need to step away for a minute and analyze our own viewing patterns to make a decision.
Digital Video Recorders have become the new phenomenon. Households are buying them up monthly and every room in the house is seeing one. We use them to record our favorite shows when we are out of the house so we can view them later. We ues them to record our favorite shows when we are in the house but busy, so we can watch them later. We also use them to record our favorite shows while we are watching them, so we can go back and watch later.
Is there a major problem here? I don't see one. The reason being is because we use DVRs for all sorts of reasons. Whether we are in the house or not, we still use them. But remember, the key phrase is we go back to watch the program later.
For those of you who have not used a DVR, when you fast forward through those commercials, you still have to see a few seconds of them. Remember how VCRs used to be when you would record a program, then fast forward, it would go to a blue screen and you would see the fast-forward button in the corner. DVRs still allow you to see the program while you are fast forwarding.
This is why DVRs are not killing the advertising. We still have to see a blip of the commercial. It does not disappear completely.
My viewing habits might be different than the rest of you. I record several of my favorite programs on a nightly basis. I go back and watch them when nothing is on, or when I'm doing housework and I want the tv on. I rarely fast forward a show that I've recorded because I'm busy doing stuff while the program is playing. I still hear the advertisements; several times in fact. I probably have a higher recall rate of anyone who has simply sat through the entire program earlier in the week. The reason being is because I've already watched this program again two or three times (Seinfeld, I still enjoy it over and over again) and I have now heard the same ad just as many times.
The same rules apply for me if I actually sit and fast-forward through the program. I have now seen every advertisement; albeit in a few quick seconds I've still seen the ad. If it's an ad that I've seen before then an advertiser is still building frequency in my mind because I've now seen the ad again and it's stuck.
So although my analysis is in no way factual. It is not based on any research. It is solely based on my own viewing habits and ideas. I refuse to believe that television advertising is being eroded because of DVRs. If anything, I believe it is giving advertisers more opportunity to reach their audience. What harm can it be to the advertiser if I watch that same recorded show two, three, or four times? No harm at all because they just received free advertisements and increased their frequency without even knowing it.